<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/">
  <channel>
    <title>Patent &amp; Legal Discussion</title>
    <description>Patent &amp; Legal Discussion</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2026 13:55:30 +0000</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2026 13:55:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>Algae Scrubbing</generator>
    <link>https://www.algaescrubbing.com/forums/patent-legal-discussion.56/</link>
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://www.algaescrubbing.com/forums/patent-legal-discussion.56/index.rss"/>
    <item>
      <title>Patent &amp; Legal issues</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2015 15:48:27 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.algaescrubbing.com/threads/patent-legal-issues.479/</link>
      <guid>https://www.algaescrubbing.com/threads/patent-legal-issues.479/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (Turbo)</author>
      <dc:creator>Turbo</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[I added this section because these types of issues affect everyone interested in Algae Scrubbers.<br />
<br />
Algae Scrubbers are a great tool for aquarium use. I think most can agree on this.  Bryan Farrish, better known as Santa Monica, stated at one point that he would never patent anything.  That was before he came up with the Upflow idea. <br />
<br />
Although many have pointed out that his idea for the UAS might not really have been totally 100% original (I&#039;ll have to dig up the thread I&#039;m thinking of) it...<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.algaescrubbing.com/threads/patent-legal-issues.479/" class="internalLink">Patent &amp; Legal issues</a>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Santa Monica Appendages - WIPO (PCT - International)</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2015 16:27:31 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.algaescrubbing.com/threads/santa-monica-appendages-wipo-pct-international.475/</link>
      <guid>https://www.algaescrubbing.com/threads/santa-monica-appendages-wipo-pct-international.475/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (Turbo)</author>
      <dc:creator>Turbo</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[No updates on this from SM on his site, but for anyone interested in keeping up with the status of his application, it&#039;s all right here:<br />
<br />
<a href="http://patentscope.wipo.int/search/en/detail.jsf?docId=WO2013138201&amp;recNum=3&amp;office=&amp;queryString=ALLNUM%3A%28138201%29&amp;prevFilter=&amp;sortOption=Pub+Date+Desc&amp;maxRec=22" target="_blank" class="externalLink" rel="nofollow">http://patentscope.wipo.int/search/...revFilter=&amp;sortOption=Pub+Date+Desc&amp;maxRec=22</a><br />
<br />
I&#039;m not a legal expert but when compared to the HOG PCT it seems this one got kind of half and half.<br />
<br />
Personally I can&#039;t understand how he can claim textured anything, because...<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.algaescrubbing.com/threads/santa-monica-appendages-wipo-pct-international.475/" class="internalLink">Santa Monica Appendages - WIPO (PCT - International)</a>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Santa Monica UAS - US</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2015 16:26:56 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.algaescrubbing.com/threads/santa-monica-uas-us.478/</link>
      <guid>https://www.algaescrubbing.com/threads/santa-monica-uas-us.478/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (Turbo)</author>
      <dc:creator>Turbo</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[No updates on this from SM on his site, but for anyone interested in keeping up with the status of his application, it&#039;s all right here:<br />
<br />
<a href="http://portal.uspto.gov/pair/PublicPair" target="_blank" class="externalLink" rel="nofollow">http://portal.uspto.gov/pair/PublicPair</a><br />
<br />
Select Publication Number and enter: 2013-0233779<br />
<br />
Looks like it&#039;s still marked Ready for Examination]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Santa Monica Illumination - WIPO (PCT - International)</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2014 01:22:21 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.algaescrubbing.com/threads/santa-monica-illumination-wipo-pct-international.477/</link>
      <guid>https://www.algaescrubbing.com/threads/santa-monica-illumination-wipo-pct-international.477/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (Turbo)</author>
      <dc:creator>Turbo</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[No updates on this from SM on his site, but for anyone interested in keeping up with the status of his application, it&#039;s all right here:<br />
<br />
<a href="http://patentscope.wipo.int/search/en/detail.jsf?docId=WO2013077918&amp;recNum=6&amp;office=&amp;queryString=ALLNUM%3A%28077918%29&amp;prevFilter=&amp;sortOption=Pub+Date+Desc&amp;maxRec=28" target="_blank" class="externalLink" rel="nofollow">http://patentscope.wipo.int/search/...revFilter=&amp;sortOption=Pub+Date+Desc&amp;maxRec=28</a><br />
<br />
Looks like this one is split up all over the place.  Oh well like anyone was really going to use it anyways, sounds way too complex to get another 2% growth.]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Santa Monica UAS - WIPO (PCT - International)</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2014 00:41:52 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.algaescrubbing.com/threads/santa-monica-uas-wipo-pct-international.476/</link>
      <guid>https://www.algaescrubbing.com/threads/santa-monica-uas-wipo-pct-international.476/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (Turbo)</author>
      <dc:creator>Turbo</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[No updates on this from SM on his site, but for anyone interested in keeping up with the status of his application, it&#039;s all right here:<br />
<br />
<a href="http://patentscope.wipo.int/search/en/detail.jsf?docId=WO2012154328&amp;recNum=2&amp;office=&amp;queryString=ALLNUM%3A%28154328%29&amp;prevFilter=&amp;sortOption=Pub+Date+Desc&amp;maxRec=13" target="_blank" class="externalLink" rel="nofollow">http://patentscope.wipo.int/search/...revFilter=&amp;sortOption=Pub+Date+Desc&amp;maxRec=13</a><br />
<br />
Looks like he got the green light on the UAS from WIPO<br />
<br />
As of November of 2013.  So he&#039;s been sitting on this, anyone know why?]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Santa Monica HOG - WIPO (PCT - International)</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2014 00:32:47 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.algaescrubbing.com/threads/santa-monica-hog-wipo-pct-international.474/</link>
      <guid>https://www.algaescrubbing.com/threads/santa-monica-hog-wipo-pct-international.474/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (Turbo)</author>
      <dc:creator>Turbo</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[No updates on this from SM on his site, but for anyone interested in keeping up with the status of his applications, it&#039;s all right here:<br />
<br />
<a href="http://patentscope.wipo.int/search/en/detail.jsf?docId=WO2013101775&amp;recNum=3&amp;office=&amp;queryString=ALLNUM%3A%28101775%29&amp;prevFilter=&amp;sortOption=Pub+Date+Desc&amp;maxRec=34" target="_blank" class="externalLink" rel="nofollow">http://patentscope.wipo.int/search/...revFilter=&amp;sortOption=Pub+Date+Desc&amp;maxRec=34</a><br />
<br />
It appears that he got the green light from WIPO on the HOG]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
